I wasn’t sure if I was going to count The Innocent Man by John Grisham as far as the 09 Book Challenge goes but after reading it I deceided to count it.
I’ve never read a Grisham book but I must say, I couldn’t tell this was his first time writing non-fiction. I’m actually a little surprised he didn’t stumble into that genre sooner since he was a lawyer but maybe because of that he wanted to be able to escape a little bit in his writings. The book flowed very smoothly and at times it was hard for me to put down. You could tell he did his research about the cases and I believe he was fair to both sides. As fair as you can be to a Prosecuter who had tunnel vision and did whatever it took to put someone behind bars for a murder they didn’t committ. He didn’t sugar coat anything, he portrayed Ron Williamson as a person who had his flaws. He didn’t skip over the fact Ron had mental issues and trouble with the law. He was a man with his demons, before and after the trial and years on Death Row.
Here is a little snippet from Amazon about the book:
Grisham’s first work of nonfiction focuses on the tragedy of Ron Williamson, a baseball hero from a small town in Oklahoma who winds up a dissolute, mentally unstable Major League washout railroaded onto death row for a hometown rape and murder he did not commit. Judging by this author-approved abridgment, Grisham has chosen to present Williamson’s painful story (and that of his equally innocent “co-conspirator,” Dennis Fritz) as straightforward journalism, eschewing the more familiar “nonfiction novel” approach with its reconstructed dialogues and other adjustments for dramatic purpose. This has resulted in a book that, while it includes such intriguing elements as murder, rape, detection and judicial injustice, consists primarily of objective reportage, albeit shaded by the now-proven fact of Williamson’s innocence. He narrates the events leading up to the 1982 rape and murder of a young cocktail waitress with a mixture of suspicion and curiosity, moving on to astonishment at the prosecution’s use of deceit and false testimony to convict Williamson and Fritz and, eventually, elation at the exoneration of the two innocent men.
At the end of the book, I couldn’t get over the fact that not one person, not a Judge or cop or lawyer, involved with the case offered an apology to the men who had lost years on Death Row for a crime they didn’t committ. A crime the denied having anything to do with from day one. Accidents happen, mistakes happen but that doesn’t mean you can’t say sorry. Being able to apologize isn’t a flaw, it’s a strength. Sure, they received a large settlement but that doesn’t change the fact they are still judged and lost 13 years of their lives.
I felt it was a great story and I’m glad it was told. Sometimes I wonder how many people locked up are actually innocent. It seems like every few months you hear about a man being released because of DNA. If you’re looking for a good true story and a non-typical true crime book, this one is for you.
If you’d like to see an interview with Grisham about the book just check out the Amazon page.